data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20502/20502d4159cd8e89b6b4c4517b8aa848f2c5f18d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad074/ad0744806dc4c46a4e39c930b41cb00de2def4a8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3979c/3979cc014e22cec12fba8c66c8b761a982a9aff2" alt=""
Here's the original along with some interesting facts (note the difference in positioning of the right arm in both works):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce44c/ce44c3fd9394ffa4eb9f800d76c27dddea53f9db" alt=""
From Wikipedia: "When the statue was discovered, Laocoön's right arm was missing, along with the hand of one child and the right arm of the other. Artists and connoisseurs debated how the missing parts should be interpreted. Michelangelo suggested that the missing right arms were originally bent back over the shoulder. Others, however, believed it was more appropriate to show the right arms extended outwards in a heroic gesture. The Pope held an informal contest among sculptors to make replacement right arms, which was judged by Raphael. The winner, in the outstretched position, was attached to the statue.
In 1957, however, the original right arm of Laocoön himself was found in a builder's yard in Rome, and was in the position which had been suggested by Michelangelo. The arm has now been rejoined to the statue. There are many copies of the statue, including a well-known one in the Grand Palace of the Knights of St. John in Rhodes. Many still show the arm in the outstretched position. The copy in Rhodes has been corrected." Clearly, the copy at Versailles has not.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeb35/eeb35f2e191feb368cc7a3a65431ad156534f300" alt=""
The young and ill-fated Marie Antoinette
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e90a/0e90a7e488ef7c54901028f4280b6a717aeff88e" alt=""
The fountains at Versailles which only run on the weekends and during the high-season. Because approximately 80% of the original pumping system is still in use, they are not on continuously but only for short durations.
2 comments:
That's fascinating. I don't think I would have noticed the difference in the arm position - how neat that you caught the distinction.
Stephanie...you are too kind and give me too much credit; I noticed that the statue was a replica, but as far as the distinction, I only looked at the hand again once I went to Wikipedia to do some research as to the history of replicas on the piece and found that fascinating bit of info! I find it amazing, they even dug up that arm over 400 years later!
Post a Comment